There is a conflict, policies, and other interests, has been difficult to deal with. It needs to be addressed now, “ said Anders Roth is responsible for sustainable mobility at IVL Swedish environmental research institute Swedish environmental research institute.

in the Collision in the approaches described, by critics of the current model is, ultimately, a clash of the thoughts of the past and present.

the most frequently implemented as a proud declaration in the paper.

In reality it is the Swedish transport administration’s so-called “ basprognos used to determine the road and rail networks to be built. And with the forecast saying that traffic will increase by 31 percent between 2014 and 2040, respectively.

“ On the road is increasing, as in the scenarios, there will be congestion, and when served with a whole lot of time to remove the congestion, and in any case temporary, it describes the Jonas Åkerman, a researcher at the strategic hållbarhetsstudier at KTH in stockholm, the main idea that controls the current investment in infrastructure.

– Jonas Åkerman, a researcher at the strategic hållbarhetsstudier at the royal institute of technology.

in Sweden, which is worth more for the drivers than for users of public transport is that, for the most part, determines what is considered to be a profitable investment for society, even for generations to come.

instead, We should be thinking about climate as a framework for the socio-economic scenarios are, believe, the Jonas Åkerman.

“ We’re going to reach the goals, how to do it? We may need to reduce car travel. However, it would also have major implications for the tidsvinsterna. If you are not very familiar with how it works in this industry, one would think that it is self-evident that this is so, the mind is going, “ he said.

in the future, investment in infrastructure is estimated to be scheduled in, rather than projects, according to the same formula as in the past. Climate and climate change act, although there has been, however, the trend of operations at the Swedish transport administration will continue to work for the funktionsmålet to be achieved, that is to say, to make sure that roads and railways are being built to gobble up the traffic projections for the year 2040 predict.
the Link for the graphic

on the Finnish transport agency is a group that is focused on the hänsynsmålet, which deals with, among other things, climate change. The various research studies, as well as the Swedish transport administration’s own analysis suggests that the traffic needs to be reduced by between 10% and 40% on 25 or 30-year term, for a climate change target is to be achieved.

In this way, there is a duality of the Swedish transport administration’s assignment.

the Ambivalence is seen in the government’s climate change action plan.

it says that ”the government has clarified that the transport funktionsmålet, in essence, need to be developed in the context of the hänsynsmålet”.

the Wording, the meaning, as the researcher, Jonas Åkerman suggests, above, that the first will be the climate as a system. Since the buildup of the infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the climate objective.

but on page 113, in the same action, it appears that the explanation is more clear than that, which is something quite different, namely, that ”the function hänsynsmålen on an equal footing”.

“ Klimatlagen is blurred at the edges. It has been seen as a portalparagraf, which will be apparent in the work. The first step is to adopt the objectives has been included, but there are a number of instruments, which is difficult politically. One needs to be clear and show what the law means, then the infrastructure is being planned, “ he It at the Swedish environmental research institute.
Anders Roth, the Swedish environmental research institute. Photo credit: Jonas Tobin
, Climate change policy, the council, whose duty it is to scrutinise what the government are doing in this area.

the Council has come up with a criticism against the way in which infrastructure planning is. The implication is that the work is not good enough.

“ After the report, nothing has happened in the past. Many of the things Climate change, the council put down is the first time that the Swedish transport administration, for example, when it comes to the development of bio-fuels as a mean to cope with the climate, “ he Her.

a Similar conclusion is reached from the six agencies who have been working as a result of the fossilfrihet in the transport sector where the transport agency itself, it is just one of them.

their predictions are not in line with the climate objective has, in fact opted for a future in which the climate is attained, with a lot of biofuels, and electrification.

“ It’s an unrealistic thought, as very well as biofuels are not available in Sweden, if it is to suffice to the machinery, shipping and aviation. At present, we import most of the biofuel. The point is to assume that biofuels in totally fix the issue, is that the Dmv does not need to consider other policy instruments that affect the demand for car travel, “ he Her.

Sweden is a sparsely populated country with lots of forests, and in the future would be to vacuum the global market for biofuels was dismissed by both Anders Roth and Jonas Åkerman have found that the lack of accountability, if you want to set a good example of this.

“ It is not enough that can see his or her own role in it. It is true, certainly, that, for example, fuel prices are one of the most important means of control, but that does not mean that no infrastructure planning will also need to be adjusted, “ he Her.

This is a very, very strong bilintresse in Sweden and that the politicians know that they need to be taken into account.

the implementation of changes in the climate change programme of action is unclear“, says Anders Gullberg, a former adjunct professor at KTH in stockholm, who now runs the company’s Urban city centre, which is dealing with the digitisation, mobility, and sustainability.

“ It’s a very, very strong bilintresse in Sweden and that the politicians know that they need to be taken into account. The point of politicians in this situation are probably will be a little vague. They do not want to say very clearly that there is a hänsynsmålet (on climate, health and the local environment), which is the first, because it may require some unpopular actions against the use of cars, “ says Anders Gullberg.

of the Conflicting and ambiguous decisions don’t lead to effective policies. Instead, it will stop in the pretty case, the „he“. , Anders Gullberg, a former adjunct professor at KTH in stockholm, who now runs the company’s Urban city center. Photo: Orlando G Boström , editor-in-chief at the transport department, said that the work of many years there has been an obligation of politicians is to contribute to the climate and to describe how it feels to do it.

“ We have a clear and explicit goal is to contribute to the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in Sweden. And to achieve the goal that we have in the 2030s, “ he said.

The biggest problem, according to Bengt Olsson, is to calculate how much the transport agency is contributing to the cause.

Anders Gullberg highlights the lessons learned from the decades of the expansion of road traffic in cities.

“ No time is to be saved, for in the long term, you only. The time in the car is pretty much the same, but the distances are increasing as new roads spread out to the towns and cities of the greater distances to workplaces, and shopping centers.

IN the united states, with its vast highway system, researchers found that a driver on average to travel twice as far as european cities of a similar size, “ says Anders Gullberg.

In his job, he connects together the challenges of the development of the digital platform.

In Stockholm, sweden, where they build the Bypass, there is already a very lot of spare capacity. It may sound a little strange, but the car is in average only 1.2 people, and the trucks are running around with a lot of air, “ he said.

and to get people to switch to public transport by making it a better and less expensive is a two-way development of passenger transport in the cities, in the view of Anders Gullberg.

but when the percentage of electric cars is growing, and the tax revenue from petrol rates reduced – lobby he was already in the state, which must be paid for the use of the roads. With a whole variety of fees and charges in the urban and in the rural areas.

„the Most it’ll cost you in which many people want to go, so that there will not be a queue, and more will arrive,“ he said.

Train to be underestimated as the future of travel is expected.

this Time, on board of a kollektivfordon represents a small resmotstånd.

Experts of the cutting techniques to the major train projects.