There are, of course, it’s never too late to take action when there is a misuse of public funds, and it is very gratifying to the social Insurance act. However, the recourse to the Swedish social Insurance agency, as well as all of the other agencies, one as well as a successful grasp: the ”inter”.
the three of us, who have a lot of experience of inter, believes, in common with the governor Sven-Erik Österberg, the government’s investigator, about the bidragsbrott, the interaction is not sufficient to solve the problem. We will share the investigator’s conclusion ”that there is a need to be established as a function that receives an overall national responsibility to work to prevent erroneous payments,” but also believes that changes to legislation are also necessary.
in SVT Commissions Review in 2005, the first ground-breaking element is that it in fact was a systematic abuse of the social insurance system, the government, the relevant state authorities to improve their cooperation, and € 300 million, in order to deter fraud and abuse.
as of the then official secrets act involving the so-called general clause, which would allow cross-referencing of the classified information concerning the damage by the infringement of the individual’s privacy was outweighed by the harm of not doing so.
However, ventured to no-one in the Swedish agency director to use this section of the law, because there was a high risk that this would lead to a public debate, and to prevent damage to the agency’s brand.
However, ventured to no-one in the Swedish agency director to use this section of the law, because there was a high risk that this would lead to a public debate, and to prevent damage to the agency’s brand. For these reasons, the conclusion was to never be in this section of the law in a court of law and no case law was developed not ever. Instead, it became the prevailing opinion, which is still in force today, to be the law does on the authorities to exchange information when the only thing that prevents this is a lack of courage, and in the absence of the tjänstemannaintegritet.
also , you can consider a number of other measures that would make the fuskbekämpningen potency, and to restore the taxpayers ‚ confidence in the solidarity-financed social security system.
• A possible remedy is, the active legal support of the official secrets act, for the cross-referencing of the information. , that is to say, a duty, if certain conditions are met, to notify other authorities or to a government utbetalningsfunktion the same for all the departments. The purpose of this cross-referencing of the data is handled properly by an independent inspektionsmyndighet.
another possible measure is the support of law for a örstärkt have access to the private financial system in order to detect undue financial transactions – in which the actors, who are specialised in the utlandstransfereringar would be of particular interest, the nature of the Western Union, and PayPal, and the like.
It is important to point out that the above measures of privacy reasons, we were restricted to include only those who are in any way receive compensation from the general government transfer payment systems.
and, As to any inter-of the kind that the Insurance agency now hopes to have never before been able to achieve long-lasting results, we believe, unfortunately, the likelihood of the samverkansförsök would be able to be very low. It is to be hoped that we have got it wrong.
<
