Johanna Jaara Åstrand, and Åsa Fahlén from the Swedish teachers ‚Union, respectively, of the Teachers‘ Association wants to get rid of the waiting list as a selection criteria for a stand-alone school. There is a view that is indicated is that you want to use in combating segregation.
It is most of all concerned in the Swedish school is, according to the confederation of Swedish enterprise and the perception that results are improved for all children. Both of those are essential as they are difficult. Even if the Pisaresultaten showed a significant improvement compared to the time when the situation was at its worst in the year 2012, this is not enough. In order to develop prosperity, then we need to be one of the leading knowledge economy in an increasingly globalised world. So, ensure well-funded. Also, the equivalence needs to be improved. Nearly every fourth pupil did not complete high school is a ticking time bomb which needs to be addressed now.
it is primarily by an increased focus on knowledge in schools, law and order, the promotion of teacher training, the fight against betygsinflation, and increased state responsibility for school funding, including the diversification of the school fees. In order to strengthen the school’s knowledge and to enhance the establishment of equivalence, it is also important to the success of the schools, both private schools, as public schools, to be able to grow, and this would also reduce the lack of space at the requested school. Today is hampered in this by the current legislation, which friskoletableringar and skolutvidgningar behovsprövas. The poor schools are not, nor the bottom.
What’s notable in the Åstrands and Fahléns the article is that the focus on the friskolornas waiting. In Sweden, 15 per cent of the pupils in the schools. According to the article, seven out of the ten examined schools översökta. The country’s primary schools, it would mean the 575 schools out of a total of more than 4.800 schools.
the ticketing system has flaws that can and should be corrected, but this can hardly be the main concern of the american school, where 88 per cent of primary schools do not have the köproblematik on which the proposal is addressed to. Just a couple of weeks ago, voiced the ISSUES of the criticism of nearly half of the ämnesutbildningar, as the agency recently reviewed. The basic subjects of English and mathematics, is being questioned on the quality of the more than one-half of a degree. This would in all likelihood be a major problem and one that affects a very large proportion of the students, the schools, and the skolhuvudmännen all over the country. On this, however, the unions remained silent.
The mention of the närhetsprincip as an option. This could soon add to the researcher. And what do they mean by other criteria such as ”must be relatively free of socio-economic and segregating effects? It is the drawing of lots, or quotas, on the socio-economic basis of the advocate’s (or something else)? What are the criteria for legitimacy? So far, it is, of course, the waiting list is the only system we have for parents is to actually be able to show their preferences. Something that is neither närhetsprincip, quotas, or the drawing of lots to achieve.
in Order to reduce the köproblematiken, the focus should be to bring the successful and popular schools to grow, as well as to improve the skolvalet through the introduction of an active school choice for all students, coupled with the requirement of strong and clear quality description of the skolenhetsnivå. This could also be run the first time.
Link to a graphic
