Since the release of the judgment rendered in the Most case, has a number of stakeholders have expressed their outrage in public, including the serious fraud office, social security, and most recently, Pensionsmyndighetens director-general, mr Daniel Barr, a degree of self-government of the ROTOR of the Debate. Since there are a number of important facts, which ignores the repression of criticism, we, the undersigned representatives, on the sole reason to make a couple of corrections.
In seven months, pensioners in 120 million dollars. The public prosecutor, and the Authority is directed to, is not that these funds have lost some of the money to the third-party company that conducted the business also made money on the deals. The district court’s ruling stated that the business was carried out in accordance with the legislation in force and with market conditions, and it is difficult to understand how someone who has earned 120 million suffered from an injury.
The serious fraud office and the Authority are really upset about is that someone is profiting at someone else, that is to say, pensioners, have earned a lot of money.
in Spite of the obvious fact that, as the funds earned a lot of money in the business, chose the relevant Authority to go beyond the prosecution of the case and is trying to take over the prosecution. Pensionsmyndighetens processföring was the subject of condemnation in the district court’s judgment, the cost to the authority and thirty-two millions in legal fees. It is remarkable that a public authority which the Authority believes itself to be in a better position than the authority to which the state has appointed, namely, the serious fraud office to pursue a criminal prosecution in a court of law.
as with the Authority may, for the habit of going to the media ahead of a judicial review of a decision, and warn the court that if the acquittal, the judgment is modified, it can have a devastating impact on vital social institutions. As mentioned above, the serious fraud office and the Authority are really upset about is that someone is profiting at someone else, that is to say, pensioners, have earned a lot of money, and if you want to change it, well, then you have to deviate from the system of a free market, and may require legislation in place in order to take on the role of the public prosecutor and to put pressure on the justice system.
the Link to the graphic
