the World does not change with the use of a new word. A phenomenon that arouses discomfort as it does not feel pleasant, just for the fact that the word denoting it is painted with a nyspråklig to paint. Similar to wrote to the linguist, Lars Melin, in his op-ed piece. He also claimed that many of them were too quick to curse people, who are not picked up on a recommendation – such as the move from disability into the funktionsvariation. Therefore, it was feared that the language that seeks to include rather than exclude. His general principle was, that ”decency demands that we speak respectfully to our fellow human beings”.
which immediately leads to the equality of treatment of minority groups. A change from, for example, the patch for the same will create no change in the attitudes of the community. If the prejudice resulting from words to words, it will not take long before the same is equally impacted, as the patch.
I think, Lars Melin, the misses is the symbolism behind the shift. A new word can create a discussion that allows the bias does not follow from this ancient word. Which is exactly the same as a proof that the parcel can be. The patch is to be connected with the persecution and oppression from the English government. The sami are characterised by a very different sense of pride about their own origins.
another problem is that we don’t always agree on what that is the decent thing to do. There are only a few examples, such as gay and lesbian, the campaigns to reclaim the word, to actually can be a success.
the other problem is that we don’t always agree on what that is the decent thing to do. There are only a few examples, such as gay and lesbian, the campaigns to reclaim the word, to actually can be a success. Long considered two of the words that is derogatory. However, gay and lesbian, made them his own, and charged it with pride instead of shame.
Lars Melin, warned that the constant ordskiften created uncertainty. Yes, if the new recommendations come thick and fast, there is a risk that some people will get tired – especially if the words that is does not cause any changes in attitude.
Some people argue, for example, that it’s okay for you to say, it’s a pejorative word negro, saying that the word was taboo when they were young. The development of society, however, is still – and will, of course, the language. It is not possible to claim that Bonn is still the capital of Germany, just that it might not be the right answer, and when we were in school. By using a surprising number of the same oföränderlighetsargument when it comes to loaded words.
But the principle of modesty is of course also the språkaktivister take the initiative to the new ones. Here, Lars Melin, one of the important points.
the Decency says, reasonably, that there is a minority that is called to determine what is defamatory. There is a lot of responsibility for each group. Will be cast in between the words, for many people, and for the sudden will of the society in general to stop and listen.
But the principle of modesty is of course also the språkaktivister take the initiative to the new ones. Here, Lars Melin, one of the important points. Some of the activists, as is sometimes the well, the skamstämpla the one who has kept up with the times. The benefit, possibly, of their status in the social media, and other modern-day skampålar. However, it is not helpful either to their case or to our society in the long run.
<
