in Order to combat the common health care decay is required to be sole actors in the community to take leaf from his mouth. It is a good thing, that the medical association Heidi Stensmyren, and the Karl-Petter Thorwaldsson is now, at last, pointing to the obvious fact that private health insurance undermines the public system.
With that being said, I would like to point out some of the shortcomings of their article. It is more of a misunderstanding of what is driving the rapid growth of the private health insurance policies, which, in turn, will lead to a watered-down proposals on what needs to be done in order to break this trend.
This results in the conclusion that only by improving the public health system, so will the insurance count. As a result, three out of four of the proposed actions revolve around the improvement of the public health system, which in itself is important, but at the same time, something that is no longer of the parallel system.
Unconsciously, to play wales in the private välfärdsindustrins half of the field. There are claims that there are gaps in the public system, as the driver of an insurance market, and it’s going to continue to tell you how good the nhs is. It’s a very powerful argument. A public system is never going to work as effectively as an insurance system, for the upper classes, and, therefore, can be försäkringslobbyn to continue to use that argument ad infinitum.
and, in general, the public sector to rather, the “ mix „of public and private in a single touch of the Swedish health care“ . This is done in a thousand different ways, but primarily through private health care providers receive a variety of patients in a variety of conditions.
in This context, the authors, quite correctly, that it’s not going to be able to buy their way past the waiting lists in the publicly funded health care.
But, their actions will then become a uddlöst that ”the principle of the legislation is that health care should be distributed according to need”. It is not good enough. It is already in the Health – care act. It has the sharp proposal from the commission (see THE investigator, Deborah Lorentzis blog post on the same day, apparently, had to take a back seat to the medical association is less well-honed proposals, the result is important, but at the same time the inconsistencies of the article.
A law – Stopplagen – was set up in 2006, but it was when the right-wing government, the Economy took over.
However, a Stopplag is not sufficient for the private providers will always be looking for loopholes where they continue to mix different types of customer in the lönsammast the possible combinations. Therefore, the major question is whether the profits of the publicly-funded health care, once again, be put on the political agenda.
Stopplag and vinstförbud sound right, so sad. Let us say that we let the private, free to the public. Let the private, to flourish on it’s own, so it will be a just as rare in the flora as the time to built up a world-famous, and the public welfare model for all of its citizens.
<