we are pleased to see that Dan Holds, and the Swedish civil contingencies Agency shares our view that the involvement of civil defence in the first instance, be staffed by employees and volunteers. It’s also good on the supply of personnel for civil defense will receive a thorough examination at a public inquiry.
with a view to the possible inclusion of the civilplikten. Dan Eliasson, it would seem, however, in its reply, see also the crisis of the times, and that is the motive for a återinförd civilplikt.
in the defence forces is required in order to prepare Sweden for war (section 1 of the act on the defence forces and the height of the call). If civilpliktiga would be trained for tasks outside the scope of this activity, it would be a transfer of the cornerstones of Swedish defence policy. Such a change requires the opening of the political talks in-depth investigation. It is not something that should just slink into through a clause in a tjänsteskrivelse.
in our opinion, however, it is important not to fall into the temptation to point out solutions for problems has been formulated. The need for staff, need to be carefully considered, as well as the potential to meet the needs of staff and volunteers, and before it can be determined that the civilpliktiga to be used, and if so, how many. The committee seems now to be in the works, and we welcome that.
The bottom line is that the mistakes of the 1990s will not be repeated. When pliktades lots of young people to the training – when it came right down to it – wasn’t responding to any real need. This has resulted in a huge waste of our collective tax money, but, above all, by the civilpliktigas of time and money.
<