We believe that nuclear energy will be important in order to cope with the change and do in Sweden carbon-neutral in 2045. Emilia Bjuggren don’t agree with. Bjuggren believe that hydroelectric power generation and a district heating system is sufficient in order to secure Sweden’s need for planerbar of energy. The nuclear force freezes out, the state of a large investment in a technology which does not bear its own costs. Finally, Bjuggren, to government investments in nuclear power is likely to displace the development of other renewable sources of energy.
“ there’s only two authors in The Recent anthology, a new social-democratic policy on climate change. There are those of us who have been writing the chapter on energy policy that will oppositionsborgarrådet Emilia Bjuggren (S), the of the line.
Our analysis suggests that if Sweden is to cope with this, the need of the industry and the transport sector with access to much more energy than what we have today. In addition, it needs electricity to be planerbar. In order to meet the future needs of the planerbar of energy, we need water, and nuclear power. As we have written in our chapter, we need to increase the production of electricity from hydropower, with 20 TWh / a. In addition, the need of the state to ensure the current level of nuclear-generated electricity.
we’re phasing out of nuclear power, we are losing more than 60 TWh of planerbar of electricity. We are adding to the increase in demand for electricity for industry and the transport sector, there is a total need is 130 TWh. This may not be the hydro power, and cogeneration is possible. Hydroelectric power generation, and cogeneration has been together, alone, with a potential of around 75 TWh of energy (it can be noted that this means that we are also building hydro power, substantially in the nationalälvarna).
iffy in , the future of nuclear power is going to be profitable. „. , And it is the combination of the need for more nuclear power, and its lack of profitability, which motivates the government to fund it. In essence, it is a case of market failure that the government must address.
Finally, we are already investing in renewable sources such as wind and hydro power is already viable for the private operators. Therefore, we believe that the phased-out subsidies in the long term, will not have a significant impact on the development of technology.
In short, it is important that we provide individuals and businesses with good potential to convert to a sustainable way of life and production. An important aspect of this work is to ensure the carbon-free electricity. We believe that this is being resolved by the hydro power is being built and nuclear is kept at current levels. With that said, I will klimatomställningen does not begin or end with it. And, even if it is a sidodebatt, in order to speak with the Bjuggren, we believe that klimatomställningen to be regarded as every little helps makes a big river (in which you can use to extract the energy!).
<