the biggest (if not the founder of the Alexander Ernstberger, may feel that the outcome was a foregone conclusion, and the fact that savers benefited from the complexity of the business Ernstberger was charged with.
However, it is rather the case that the prosecution has failed to lead evidence that the depositors were damaged in such a way that it had dealt with the offence of breach of trust.
the case has, of course, at a glance, focused on the investigation of an alleged excessive price for the securities purchased for the bank’s behalf, and to be a part of this rate is subsequently passed, shall be paid a remuneration, to the enrichment of the defendant by one of the companies closely related to them.
a couple of pieces right out of the grounds.
”in Order that the charge be considered proof must the prosecution have established beyond reasonable doubt that the sale of the warrants (the securities), red.n.) led, to the detriment of the unit holders or alternatively, pension savers.”
Furthermore, the prosecutor has to show that the company has taken out a rate for their services. Since the prosecution has not brought forth any evidence in support of this the prosecution has not met its burden of proof.”
the word of god. By failing to see that the purchases are made for the rate of fall is not only the prosecution of bad faith, but, like dominoes, the other charges against him, including bribery.
in the Case regarding the alleged financial irregularities are, however, notoriously difficult, as värderingsfrågan is much more complicated. The Allrafallet, it is of special securities, that is, in itself, it is difficult to assess.
the Authority studied the Most, of an investigation that led to the fund company got kicked out of the Swedish premium pension system, asked lots of management companies around the world, where they are issued. They were rather unique and the authority did not find that they are trading on one venue, which made it even more difficult to place value on them.
the point that the crews did, they disputed the purchase, but the question still remains: did they have to be able to earn more in other trades which are not a substitute for a good chunk of the 100 million sek have been paid?
When the new pension system, the värktes up in the 1990s, there was a lot of enthusiasm – especially among the bourgeois parties, but also by some of the leading social democrats. This has led to an over-reliance on the return to savers would be free to look for the best mutual funds.
The hope has been disappointed. Most people make no conscious choice, but of the state, the Seventh Swedish national pension fund, to take care of the balance. In addition, it has been quite a good thing, as reducing the desire to actively look for other funding.
as well as the tangle of the fund company Has a Fund, however, has already had consequences. The requirements of the companies wishing to operate in the pension have been tightened up considerably, which meant that there are fewer and fewer of the pensionsmyndighetens fondtorg.
This is a good thing. The Swedish pension has the right to demand that their pensions are managed in the best possible way by a reputable company, which is also open, how, and at what cost they will put their money.
However, there is a little bit of that, throw away the yeast for the dough. It took several events before the reform came into force.
the Next step is that all fund management companies will be an statligmyndighet. Thereby, the premium pension is similar to that of the collective agreement-based occupational pension systems. A professional procurement and sign a contract with a small selection of the fund management company and puts pressure on their prices. There are employees with collective bargaining agreements have been able in most cases to enjoy over the last 20 years.
in the Swedish premium pension system has lasted for about the same amount of time. Such a shame that it has come to that time of the political system to realize that without the strict requirements, less serious companies to work for interests other than those of savers.
<
